• Review Article
  • |
  • Open Access
  • |
  • ISSN: 2639-4391

Lumpy Disease A Developing Trans-Boundary Viral Skin Disease

  • Chanchal Chandak*;
    • Department of Pharmacy, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India 443101.
  • Kiran Gaikwad;
    • Department of Pharmacy, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India 443101.
  • Jaya Ambhore;
    • Department of Pharmacy, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India 443101.
  • Priyanka lande;
    • Department of Pharmacy, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India 443101.
  • Nidhi Zanwar;
    • Department of Pharmacy, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India 443101.
  • Leena Joge;
    • Department of Pharmacy, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India 443101.
  • Vaibhav Adhao;
    • Department of Pharmacy, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India 443101.
  • Raju Thenge
    • Department of Pharmacy, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India 443101.
  • Corresponding Author(s): Chanchal S chandak

  • Assistant professor, Department of pharmacy, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India 443101.

  • chanchalchandak1998@gmail.com

  • Chandak SS (2022).

  • This Article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Received : Oct 28, 2022
Accepted : Nov 15, 2022
Published Online : Nov 17, 2022
Journal : Annals of Epidemiology and Public health
Publisher : MedDocs Publishers LLC
Online edition : http://meddocsonline.org

Cite this article: Chandak C, Gaikwad K, Ambhore J, lande P, Zanwar N, et al. Lumpy Disease A DevelopingTrans-Boundary Viral Skin Disease. 2022; 5(2): 1093.

Keywords: Lumpy skin disease; Lesions; Vulnerable; Epidemiology; Demodicosis.

Abstract

      A novel neethling virus disease or similarly known as Lumpy skin disease, is an evolving bovine viral infection. This is widespread in most African countries as well as in some Middle East zone, Asian and European countries. The virus that causes lumpy skin disease (LSD) is called the Lumpy Skin Disease Virus (LSDV), and it belongs to the Capripoxvirus genus of the Poxviridae family. It is a transnational illness with serious economic implications that affects cattle and water buffaloes. High morbidity and low death are the results of the disease, which is spread by arthropod vectors. Lumpy skin disease has made its first appearance in India with a 7.1% morbidity rate among cattle. The disease typically manifests clinically as fever, anorexia, and distinctive nodules on the skin and mucous membranes of the mouth, nostrils, udder, genital, and rectum. Abortion, infertility, and occasionally death can also occur. The disease’s epidemiological situation is still unclear in India. It may be possible to stop the disease from spreading by immunising people and enforcing rigorous quarantine rules and vector control measures .The present review focus on trans boundary dissemination, aetiology and transmission, clinical manifestations, diagnostics, and illness treatment, this study tries to summarise the most recent advancements in epidemiology.

Introduction

      Lumpy skin disease is an infectious viral illness transported on by the Lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV), which belongs to the family Poxviridae, Abundant terms use for Lumpy skin disease, including Pseudo-urticaria or Neethling virus disease or exanthema nodularisbovis, and also known as knopvelsiekte [1-2]. Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) is a trans boundary; vector-borne, non-zoonotic infection. Lumpy skin disease (LSD) currently only affects ruminants, such as cattle and water buffaloes. Among the arthropods that transmit disease are biting flies, mosquitoes, and ticks [3] However, in neethling virus disease skin lesions have been detected following experimental infection in sheep, goat, giraffe, Giant gazelles, and impalas. In some studies natural infection of sheep and goat has not been reported even in close contact with sick cattle and buffaloes. High morbidity but low mortality is linked to LSD [4]. The Neethling virus infection is noticeable by a fever, inflamed lymph nodes, circumscribed nodules on the skin and the virus infection that causes decreased milk production, acute anorexia, and infertility. Overall, it lowers the economic value of animals since it reduces their ability to produce meat and milk, effect on reproductive efficiency (abortion and infertility). It is a disease that must be reported and has an appalling impact on international cattle trade as well [5]. It noted that the first Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) case originated in Zambia and afterwards spread to southern and northern African nations. Israel, Kuwait, Oman, and Yemen later became affected by it [6]. According to Office International des Epizooties (OIE), this disease is currently widespread in a number of African, European, and Asian nations. Unknown factors may have contributed to the disease’s spread to India, such as cattle crossing international borders or vectors travelling from nearby nations. Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) use has recently been recorded in nations that border India, including Bangladesh and China. For appropriate planning of the efficient disease management, an understanding of the epidemiology of exotic illnesses becomes essential. The most recent Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) developments are summarised in this outline.

History and beginning of lumpy virus infection

      Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) was identified for the firstly in 1929 at Zambia after that some cases was observed in a number of areas of African nations [7]. Lumpy viral infection observed in all over countries like in Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Turkey, and Israel, also some cases are reported in Iran [8-12]. Therefore, the raised up threat of the spread of disease into the rest of Europe and Asia should be measured. For case in point, the statistics of Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) epidemics in some Middle Eastern states with wide-ranging boundaries given in Figure. 1 , were six cases in Iran, eight in Iraq, one thousand two hundred ninety-four in majorly in Turkey, one case in Kazakhstan, sixteen in Azerbaijan and three hundred thirty cases in observed in Russia and one case in Armenia respectively as per OIE WAHID, 2018 [13]. And in recent 18, 50,000 cases reported in India [14].

Figure 1: The number of Lumpy skin disease (LSD) cases in various countries in year 2014-2022.

Microbiology and taxonomy

      Lumpy virus is brick-shaped and oval profile double-stranded DNA virus with average size 320 nm by 260 nm as shown in Figure 2 [12,15]. As per Taxonomy classification of viruses, the Lumpy virus is the member of capripoxvirus with family Poxviridae and subfamily Chordopoxvirus .Based on the various serological evidences, Lumpy skin disease virus together with the sheeppox virus, and goatpox virus. The taxonomical classification of lumpy skin disease virus given in Figure 3.

Figure 2: Microbiology of Lumpy virus.

Figure 3: Lumpy skin disease virus taxonomical Classification.

Epidemiology

Morbidity and mortality

      The death of Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) epidemic varies enormously. The morbidity rate in cattle can differ from 3 to 85% reliant on the occurrence of insect vectors and host exposure. Death is low in most cases (1 to 3%), but can be as high as 20 to 85%. Remarkably high mortality rates in range 75 to 85% in some outbreaks [16].

Host range

      LSDV (Lumpy skin disease virus) principally affects cattle however also saw in domestic Asian water buffaloes [17] .The European Bos Taurus is commonly more susceptible than Sub-Saharan Bos indicus. Young calves are majorly prone to the infection and could grow the representative lesion in 24 to 48 hours, while overall group of age’s animals are prone to lumpy virus. Furthermore, impala and giraffe has experimentally sick with Lumpy skin disease virus. Pet buffaloes are highly ill from Lumpy virus than wild buffaloes [18].

Trasmission of lumpy virus

      Transmission is assumed to occur mostly by arthropod vector. No exact vector has been recognized so far, definite type of mosquitoes, biting flies also the male ticks can play a role in the conduction of the virus. Direct contact with infected animal is playing a minor role in the spread of lumpy skin disease. The virus can be transmitted through blood, nasal discharge, lacrimal secretions, semen and saliva. The infection can moreover be spread through septic milk to suckling calves. In reported studies infected cattle, lumpy skin virus was observed in saliva 11 days later the increase in fever, virus is observed in semen later 22 days, and in skin nodules lumpy virus observed after 33 days. The infectious virus is not detected in faces. Lumpy Skin Disease Virus (LSDV) can stay feasible in infected matter for around 120 days [19-21]. Figure 4 depicts a summary of virus transmission.

Figure 4: Summary of virus transmission.

Clinical features

      According to the healthcare veterinary specialized and study reported ,mostly Skin lumps having round shape with 5-50 mm size developed on skin ,Figure 5, and generally seem two days later the start of temperature , on the skin of the neck, head, genitalia, udder, perineum, also on limbs. The nodules can spread on the whole body, in several cases more than 100 nodules can appear on skin[22].The nodules can fade or may produce scars. In the more case the lesions then grow into papules, pustules with exudate, and lastly convert into scabs. The scratches recover gently. In observed cases after two to three weeks the skin wounds toughen and convert in form of necrotic, making the animals painful and making them hesitant to move. The representative scratch "sitfast" may slough, leaving holes that could invite bacterial invasion and screwworm fly invasion, both of which could result in septicaemia [23].

Figure 5: Skin lumps due to lumpy skin disease virus.

Diagnosis

      At present, tentative judgement can be made on the basis of skin nodules observed on face, eyelid, neck, muzzle, nostrils, udder, and limbs. Laboratory confirmation of lumpy disease is most rapid by an actual or conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). The Virus Neutralisation Test (VNT) is the only validated serological test available for lumpy virus. Several antibody-detecting Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) have been described for detection of lumpy skin disease virus [24-25].

Treatment

      There is no specific antiviral treatment available for LSD infected cattle. Sick animals may be removed from the herd and given supportive treatment consisting of local wound dressing to discourage fly worry and prevent secondary infections bacterial infection [26]. Systemic antibiotics also given to sick animals.

Prevention and control of lumpy VIRUS

      There is currently no effective LSD treatment available. Anti-inflammatory and antibacterial medications are used to treat symptoms. Effective control and preventative measures must be adopted in order to control the disease, including [25,27].

      (A) Restrict movement: In order to stop the spread of a transboundary disease, it is imperative to outright ban the movement of any animals that have been exposed to LSD. To stop the rapid spread of disease among nations, animals having these lesions should be isolated for inspection.

      (B) Reduce vector migration since it may spread disease: Vectors may move according to prevailing winds. The disease can also be prevented by employing vector control techniques like the use of vector traps and pesticides.

      (C) Vaccination: There is a live attenuated LSD vaccination on the market. Businesses created vaccinations based on various LSD virus strains. It is either based on the SIS Neethling type or the Neethling strain used in products like the Lumpy Skin Disease Vaccine for Cattle (Onderstepoort Biological Products; OBP, South Africa) and Bovivax (MCI SanteAnimale, Morocco) (Lumpyvax, MSD Animal Health-Intervet, South Africa). Since the virus that causes sheeppox and goatpox is closely related to LSD, the vaccine for those diseases can be used to treat LSD [28].According to the OIE, many viral strains are utilised as vaccine strains. Three years of protection are provided by the South African homologous Neethling strain of the Lumpy Skin Disease virus after passages of 60 times in lamb kidney cells and 20 times on the chorioallantoic membrane of embryonated chicken eggs. Kenyan sheep pox virus passaged 18 times in lamb testis (LT) cells or foetal calf muscle cells, Yugoslavian RM 65 sheep pox strain, and Romanian sheep pox strain are among the sheep pox strains utilised as vaccinations against LSD. Local responses are brought on by the strains of the heterologous vaccination. As these vaccines could act as a source of infection for a susceptible population of sheep, they are not recommended in locations where sheep pox and goat pox are prevalent.goat, too. Live attenuated Gorgangoatpox strain offers effective side-effect-free protection for cattle [29]. Since the LSD virus is stable and lasts a long time in the environment, long-term immunisation with 100% coverage should be made mandatory for disease control and prevention. It is advisable to immunise new animals before bringing them to the impacted farm. At the age of 3 to 4 months, calves that have been nursed by moms who have received vaccinations or are infected naturally should be inoculated. Each year, pregnant cows and breeding bulls might receive vaccinations [30].

Conclusion

      The current feast of the infection into disease-free regions specifies its epidemiological and financial importance. In view of the broad boundaries of Middle East nations, animal activities between these nations should be thoughtfully measured by veterinary experts. Additionally, remunerating close attention to the various aspects of the infection, like conduction and epidemiology, and the implementation of actual precautionary processes such as immunization, could outcome in recovering disease regulation. Therefore, precise and appropriate identification in endemic zones, vaccination with the similar strain of the Lumpy skin disease virus, animal movement restriction ,vector controller, and Lumpy skin disease virus, testing of bulls selected for breeding are extremely optional as tools to regulate more spread.

Acknowledgments

      The authors appreciate the support of Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur.

Conflict of interest

      The authors declare that there was no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Salihi K. Lumpy skin disease: Review of literature. Mirror of research in veterinary sciences and animals. 2014; 3: 6-23.
  2. Beltran-Alcrudo D, Gallardo MA, Kramer SA, Penrith ML, Kamata A, et al. African swine fever: detection and diagnosis. Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2017.
  3. Lubinga JC, Tuppurainen ES, Stoltsz WH, Ebersohn K, Coetzer JA, et al. Detection of lumpy skin disease virus in saliva of ticks fed on lumpy skin disease virus-infected cattle. Experimental and applied acarology. 2013; 61: 129-138.
  4. Abutarbush SM, Ababneh MM, Al Zoubi IG, Al Sheyab OM, Al Zoubi MG, et al. Lumpy Skin Disease in J ordan: Disease Emergence, Clinical Signs, Complications and Preliminary‐associated Economic Losses. Transboundary and emerging diseases. 2015; 62:549-54.
  5. Morris JP. Pseudo-urticaria. Northern Rhodesia. Dept Anim Health Ann Rpt. 1930; 12.
  6. Wainwright SH, El Idrissi A, Mattioli RA, Tibbo MA, Njeumi FE, et al. Emergence of lumpy skin disease in the Eastern Mediterranean Basin countries. FAO Empres Watch. 2013; 29: 1-6.
  7. Martin WB, Martin B, Hay D, Lauder IM. Bovine ulcerative mammillitis caused by a herpesvirus. The Veterinary record. 1966; 78: 494-497.
  8. Alemayehu G, Zewde G, Admassu B. Risk assessments of lumpy skin diseases in Borena bull market chain and its implication for livelihoods and international trade. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2013; 45: 1153-1159.
  9. Wainwright SH, El Idrissi A, Mattioli RA, Tibbo MA, Njeumi FE, et al. Emergence of lumpy skin disease in the Eastern Mediterranean Basin countries. FAO Empres Watch. 2013; 29: 1-6.
  10. Al‐Salihi KA, Hassan IQ. Lumpy skin disease in Iraq: study of the disease emergence. Transboundary and emerging diseases. 2015; 62: 457-462.
  11. Ali AA, Esmat M, Attia H, Selim A, Abdel-Hamid YM. Clinical and pathological studies of lumpy skin disease in Egypt. Veterinary Record. 1990; 127: 549-550.
  12. Sameea Yousefi P, Mardani K, Dalir‐Naghadeh B, Jalilzadeh‐Amin G. Epidemiological study of lumpy skin disease outbreaks in North‐western Iran. Transboundary and emerging diseases. 2017; 64: 1782-1789.
  13. OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health). World Animal Health Information Database (WAHIS) Interface.
  14. Rao, Lingamgunta Nirmitha Goswami, Sohini. Lumpy skin disease: Lakhs of cattle suffer, Rajasthan worst-hit, Hindustan Times. 2022.
  15. Tulman ER, Afonso CL, Lu Z, Zsak L, Kutish GF, et al. Genome of lumpy skin disease virus. Journal of virology. 2001; 75: 7122-7130.
  16. Tuppurainen ES, Lubinga JC, Stoltsz WH, Troskie M, Carpenter ST, et al. Evidence of vertical transmission of lumpy skin disease virus in Rhipicephalus decoloratus ticks. Ticks and tick-borne diseases. 2013; 4: 329-333.
  17. Greta A, Gourreau JM, Vassart M, Wyers M, Lefevre PC. Capripoxvirus disease in an Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx) from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 1992; 28: 295-300.
  18. Young E, Basson PA, Weiss KE. Experimental infection of the Giraffe [Giraffa cameleopardis (Linnaeus, 1762)], Impala [Aepyceros melampus (Lichtenstein, 1812)] and the Cape Buffalo [Syncerus caffer (Sparrman, 1779)] with lumpy skin disease virus (1966). To be published. Onderstepoort J vet Res. 1968.
  19. Feyisa AF. A case report on clinical management of lumpy skin disease in bull. Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology. 2018; 9: 538.
  20. Nawathe DR, Asagba MO, Abegunde A, Ajayi SA, Durkwa L. Some observations on the occurrence of lumpy skin disease in Nigeria. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe B. 1982; 29: 31-36.
  21. Gumbe AA. Review on lumpy skin disease and its economic impacts in Ethiopia. J Dairy Vet Anim Res. 2018; 7: 39-46.
  22. Lubinga JC, Tuppurainen ES, Stoltsz WH, Ebersohn K, Coetzer JA, et al. Detection of lumpy skin disease virus in saliva of ticks fed on lumpy skin disease virus-infected cattle. Experimental and applied acarology. 2013; 61: 129-138.
  23. Carn VM, Kitching RP. An investigation of possible routes of transmission of lumpy skin disease virus (Neethling). Epidemiology & Infection. 1995; 114: 219-226.
  24. Ali H, Ali AA, Atta MS, Cepica A. Common, emerging, vector‐borne and infrequent abortogenic virus infections of cattle. Transboundary and emerging diseases. 2012; 59: 11-25.
  25. Tuppurainen ES, Venter EH, Coetzer JA, Bell-Sakyi L. Lumpy skin disease: attempted propagation in tick cell lines and presence of viral DNA in field ticks collected from naturally-infected cattle. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases. 2015; 6: 134-140.
  26. Wallace DB, Ellis CE, Espach A, Smith SJ, Greyling RR, et al. Protective immune responses induced by different recombinant vaccine regimes to Rift Valley fever. Vaccine. 2006; 24: 7181-7189.
  27. Brenner J, Bellaiche M, Gross E, Elad D, Oved Z, et al. Appearance of skin lesions in cattle populations vaccinated against lumpy skin disease: statutory challenge. Vaccine. 2009; 27:1500-1503.
  28. Mangana-Vougiouka O, Markoulatos P, Koptopoulos G, Nomikou K, Bakandritsos N, et al. Sheep poxvirus identification by PCR in cell cultures. Journal of Virological Methods. 1999; 77: 75-79.
  29. Greta A, Gourreau JM, Vassart M, Wyers M, Lefevre PC. Capripoxvirus disease in an Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx) from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 1992; 28: 295-300.
  30. Sprygin A, Babin Y, Pestova Y, Kononova S, Wallace DB, et al. Analysis and insights into recombination signals in lumpy skin disease virus recovered in the field. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0207480.

MedDocs Publishers

We always work towards offering the best to you. For any queries, please feel free to get in touch with us. Also you may post your valuable feedback after reading our journals, ebooks and after visiting our conferences.