• Review Article
  • |
  • Open Access

Can we identify medical students and residents at risk for attrition in general surgery and intervene before residents quit?

  • Charles E Geno;
    • Assistant Professor of Family, Internal & Rural Medicine, College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
  • Catherine Skinner;
    • Associate Professor of OB/GYN, Associate Professor of Family, Internal & Rural Medicine, College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
  • John Burkhardt Gregg;
    • Assistant Professor of Psychiatry & Behavioral Medicine, College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
  • Joseph C Wallace;
    • Associate Professor & Chair of Surgery, College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
  • Andrew G Harrell;
    • Assistant Professor of Surgery, College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
  • Garrett Taylor;
    • Senior Medical Student, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  • Gregg Bell;
    • Senior data analyst for the Department of Community Medicine and Population Health and the College’s Institute for Rural Health Research, Alabama, USA
  • Daniel M Avery
    • Professor of Surgery, College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Peter Bryce Blvd Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
  • Corresponding Author(s): Daniel M Avery

  • Professor of Surgery, College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Peter Bryce Blvd Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA

  • davery@ua.edu

  • Avery DM (2018).

  • This Article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Received : Mar 09, 2018
Accepted : Apr 13, 2018
Published Online : Apr 20, 2018
Journal : International Journal of Innovative Surgery
Publisher : MedDocs Publishers LLC
Online edition : http://meddocsonline.org

Cite this article: Avery DM, Geno CE, Skinner C, Gregg JB, Wallace JC, et al. Can we identify medical students and residents at risk for attrition in general surgery and intervene before residents quit? Int J Innov Surg. 2018; 1: 1002.

Abstract

Many general surgery residents contemplate quitting residency at some time during their training. Once a surgery resident decides that general surgery will not provide the desired lifestyle, the chance of him completing his residency decreases significantly and quitting is inevitable. Residency programs must improve their ability to identify those residents contemplating quitting residencies and intervene. Intervention may be possible with early identification of medical students and residents at risk for attrition.

Introduction

      Many general surgery residents contemplate quitting residency at some time during training [1]. Once a surgery resident decides that general surgery will not provide the desired lifestyle, they are much less likely to complete their residency and quitting is inevitable [2]. If the current trend of attrition in surgery is to be curtained, residency programs must improve their ability to identify residents who may be contemplating quitting surgery in order to intervene [3]. Support systems are needed for residents including counseling and social support [3]. The current problem for Program Directors (PDs) is retention of current residents [2]. Finding those at risk during training is paramount before it is too late [4]. It is important for students pursuing a surgery residency to understand the demands and expectations before matriculating [4]. One institution described techniques to deal with stress and fatigue with crisis intervention but, it would be helpful to intervene before the crisis stage, at which point; residents are likely to quit [4].

      Residency Program Directors (PD) and surgery faculty must be proactive about the retention of general surgery residents because many residents contemplate leaving surgery [1]. More female residents leave residency than male [1]. Moreover, they leave early -usually after the first year (PGY 1) [1]. Faculty need to be mindful of what is going on with the residents so that intervention is possible if problems are identified in a timely manner [4]. When a resident is discouraged to the point of leaving residency, it is hard to appreciate the value of continuing surgery training and most quit [4]. The most common reason residents quit general surgery is uncontrollable lifestyle [14]. Almost half of female residents leave after the first year [4]. Women also leave for other reasons like lack of role models and mentors, sexual discrimination and harassment and feeling unwanted in the surgical suite [4]. Early identification and intervention are critical to resolving these issues [4].

Identification of those at risk for attrition

      Many risk factors for attrition have been identified in the literature and in our research [5-7]. They are categorized by medical student applicants for general surgery residencies (Table 1) and current general surgery residents (Table 2).Thematically, medical student categories center around lack of role models, faculty mentors and adequate career counseling for general surgery careers, lack of medical student understanding about a surgery career and adequate preparation for a surgery residency, discrimination and sexual harassment of females in surgery and personality traits not conducive to practicing surgery (Table 1).

table 1 Table 1

Table 1: Identification of medical students matriculating into surgery at risk for attrition.

table 2 Table 2

Table 2: Identification of medical students matriculating into surgery at risk for attrition.

      Resident categories include lack of guidance from the residency program, lack of role models and mentors, personality and character traits not conducive to the practice of surgery, lack of accommodation for females, discrimination against females in surgery, lack of support programs, counseling, and crisis intervention and bullying and mistreatment of residents (Table 2).

Interventions to reduce risk of attrition

      There have been several suggested interventions that may be helpful to medical students applying to general surgery residencies and current general surgery residents at risk for attrition.

Interventions for Medical Students

Better education of medical students about surgery residency expectations

      Educating medical students about exactly what general surgery residency and practice entails is crucial [3]. Attrition early in residency suggests that the actual residency training was different from medical school expectations gained in medical school [8]. Program Directors (PD) and surgery faculty need to be more involved with medical students who express an interest in general surgery as a career [9]. It is important for students pursuing a general surgery residency to understand the demands and expectations of a surgery resident [4]. Limited exposure to surgery poorly prepares medical students for the actual life of a resident which leads to discouragement and increases the risk of attrition [9]. Students need more experiences with both inpatient and outpatient care, the operating room, postoperative management, emergency department, postoperative assessment, daily rounds and emergency surgery [9]. In a previous paper, medical students evaluating the surgery clerkship requested more case studies, more surgical experience, elective time, more postoperative management, more subspecialty surgery exposure and more technical skills training [5].

Better preparation of medical students before residency

      An acting internship or “AI” allows a medical student to gain experience as a surgery intern in a general surgery residency. The “AI” functions exactly like an actual intern the duration of the rotation. The intern scrubs on cases, closes the operative incision, writes postoperative orders or enters orders electronically on the electronic medical record, sees consultations in the emergency department, the hospital floors, intensive care units and takes “first call” at night. Thus, the student is better able to see if he wants to be a surgery resident. Medical students usually serve as “AIs” at a location with a general surgery residency into which he might like to matriculate. The extra time spent in the “AI” not only helps students understand what is expected of them from a medical perspective but also might help them prepare for the psychological and lifestyle impacts of a surgical residency.

Better pre-matriculation screening and selection of medical students for surgery residency

      Selecting residents is just part of the challenge of running a surgery residency (4). While medical student applicants must be academically acceptable, non-academic factors may be more important than academic ones [10]. Elimination of applicants at high risk for attrition from the applicant pool before the match is recommended [10]. When residents leave training programs, improving resident replacement with qualified physicians is imperative [10]. No medical student should matriculate into a surgery residency who is not willing to commit to the work, time and demands, both during residency and for a career beyond [4]. Most students (89%) select surgery as a career “because of the nature of surgical practice” [11]. Most residents (76%) quit because of lifestyle issues [11]. Grit is a character trait defined by passion and perseverance for long-term goals and may be a marker of attrition [10]. Low scores of grit have been associated with residents contemplating leaving residency [10].

Positive role models

      Students respond well to positive resident and attending role models who students can look up to [12]. Students need successful private practice general surgeons to emulate. However, most private surgeons agreed that work limited their personal and family time. Only a small minority of general surgeons would not recommend surgery as a career specialty [13]. There are no underrepresented role models for minorities and this probably translates into minimal interest in general surgery from underrepresented minorities [14]. Gender specific role models are important for female medical students interested in general surgery [12].

Faculty mentors

      Mentors in medical school are essential [14]. Mentors are usually faculty who teach medical students and residents and help them succeed. There is a need to portray our lives to residents and students as a sense of purpose in what surgeons do a commitment to high quality care, and professional satisfaction [3]. Residents in general surgery can be excellent educators and mentors and can influence the number of medical students pursuing a general surgery career [16]. Gender specific faculty mentors are critical for female medical students interested in surgery [15]. There are very few female general surgery mentors primarily because of the lack of female general surgeons. Female medical students have depended on both male and female mentors because of the so few number of female surgery mentors. While male mentors are important historically, female mentors have the advantage of experience with pregnancy, breastfeeding, pumping and child-raising that males would not have. More importantly if the female medical students can learn from a female mentor that being a female surgeon can fit into a family oriented lifestyle they maybe more likely to pursue surgery and have reduced attrition attributed to this important life area. Structured mentoring has been shown to reduce burnout [15].

Reduce discrimination against females

      Many female medical students and female surgery residents believe that surgery discriminates against women, leading many women to feel out of place in the operating suite [14]. Much of this comes from lack of female role models and lack of a life outside the hospital [14]. This can be improved with more female general surgeons and more female role models and mentors. It is important to change the professional environment for women [17]. As more women matriculate into general surgery, the male dominated environment should change asfemale surgery residents are more compassionate and concerned with the feelings of others [18].

Exposure to private practice surgeons

      Medical students need exposure to private practice general surgeons. The only real exposure to general surgery is often surgery residents who are tired, overworked and exhausted. Trainees often have less interaction with private practice general surgeons [13]. Private practice surgeons earn higher incomes, are usually very successful and satisfied with their profession [13].

Screening for personality types

      An older 1984 paper suggests that some medical students may tolerate stress better than others and may make better surgery residents [19]. Many students interested in surgery have been described as “aggressive, self-confident, competitive, thick-skinned, and authoritarian [20]. They have less anxiety and are resistant to stress [20]. Personality may determine specialty choice-the desire to fix things and correct problems with immediate results has been thought to be desirable for surgery [20].

Psychological assessment

      Ninety-nine percent of medical students rank general surgery as the first or second most stressful medical specialty [20]. Linn suggests that some medical students may tolerate stress better than others and may make better surgery residents [19]. The World of Work Inventory Online (WOWI Online) multidisciplinary assessment has been used to determine a stable profile of surgeons and suitability for the surgical profession [2]. This has been shown to be a consistent, reproducible personality assessment which could useful in predicting success in a residency program and practice of surgery [2]. The question remains if it could be useful to predict success of matriculates to surgery residencies [2].

Interventions for General Surgery Residents

Guidance during the residency program

      Surgery residents need guidance and supervision throughout residency training [4,21]. Residents are concerned about their performance [21]. They need to know what the residency program expects of them from the outset [4,22]. Today, house-staff surgeons have portfolios and know the milestone commensurate with their level of training [2]. They should receive progress reports, evaluations and feedback on their performance in addition to the yearly end of the year in-service examinations [22]. Learners must perform certain numbers of each procedures to be competent at that procedure. Excellent work must be encouraged [22]. Residency programs must follow work hour guidelines and restrictions and the workload must be commensurate with the work hours. Programs must keep research year residents in touch with the residency and the other residents because the research year is a common time to quit a general surgery residency. Residents in the research year feel detached from the rest of the program. Some clinical responsibilities, journal club, grand rounds, morbidity and mortality conference, and even residency social functions may keep research year residents in touch and reduce attrition that accompanies this year.

Mentors

      General surgery faculty mentors help residents see their potential and encourage them in their career [1]. Residents need exposure to the private practice general surgeons for a broader view of the field of surgery individual success and satisfaction [14]. Factors associated with quitting included absence of a faculty mentor [9]. Initiating mentor/resident relationships early with incoming residents and refining those relationships are critical [15]. Regular meetings, career counseling, structured mentoring and easy accessibility to mentors are important [9,15]. Mentors need to be satisfied with the specialty so that they can be enthusiastic to residents [23]. Only female mentors can help female residents with the balance of professional life and pregnancy, raising children and motherhood [4,12, 15]. Female mentors help attract female medical students and help improve the outlook and productivity for future surgeons [15]. New interns need relationships and guidance from upper level residents [15]. When female general surgery mentors are unavailable, specialty and subspecialty female surgeons, anesthesiologists, OB/GYNs and family medicine/obstetricians may help fulfil the role. Underrepresented minority residents also need mentors, role models and respect to be successful [4,12].

Accommodations specific for female residents

      Female residents in all specialties have children during residency training. Formal policies addressing pregnancy, maternity leave, breastfeeding and pumping, and parenting are necessary [21,24]. Residency programs need formal policies for pregnancy with contingency plans when female residents cannot work and/or perform clinical duties such as complications of pregnancy and sick infants such as preterm deliveries [21, 24]. Plans for not overburdening other residents because of another resident’s pregnancy are important [24]. Having such policies and plans will provide for greater happiness among everyone concerned [24].

      The most common benefit for female surgery residents and practicing general surgeons is formal maternity leave [21]. Maternity leave is essential for female physicians in any specialty and at any level of training. While many female physicians have had children during medical school and residency, only 25% of women have their first children during surgery residencies [25]. Women must make more sacrifices during residences such as marriage and childbearing [21].Childcare is essential for female surgery residents who have children. On-site daycare is preferable but uncommon [3,13].

      The Parent/Newborn Health Elective is a recently developed elective for new postpartum resident mothers at the University of Alabama Family Medicine Residency in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The elective limits time off and allows the physician mother to return to work with minimal clinic responsibility but no hospital duties or call. Other programs may have similar programs.

Improving confidence

      Progression of surgery residency training is dependent on the development of confidence [21]. Normally confidence increases with progression of residency training culminating with the ability of a senior or chief resident to function as a junior attending and ultimately to practice independently in the real world [21]. Residency program may improve factors that relate to low confidence [21]. Learning experiences improve surgical confidence [21]. Confidence is better in community programs, programs with fewer chief residents, and programs without fellowships [21]. Senior medical students in surgery improve their confidence during residency [21]. Decreased confidence is associated with the need to pursue further training in a fellowship [21]. Fellowship training probably narrows their surgical focus after training and reduces their spectrum of general surgery. Female surgery residents worry about their performance more than males and often this results in quitting residency [21].

Changing the culture of training programs

      Surgery residencies must change the age-old culture of a male-dominated specialty. Training programs must address reports by female residents that they feel unwanted and unwelcome in the operating suite [4]. Negative attitudes toward female residents and surgeons must also be addressed [4]. Sexual harassment and sex discrimination of female residents cannot be tolerated [4]. Programs cannot tolerate bullying, belittlement, and mistreatment [1,18]. Residents subjects to these problems are probably more likely to quit surgery residencies.

Support programs, counseling, and crisis intervention

      Support programs, counseling, and crisis intervention are important in every type of residency but are imperative in general surgery with the demands that are placed on residents. Individual therapy, marriage counseling, substance abuse counseling, and career counseling may be needed. Some residents report social support with spouses, family, friends and religious beliefs may help dealing with the stresses of residents; others may not have these luxuries and mechanisms to deal with discouragement, exhaustion and burnout [15]. Other residents report using exercise to deal with these stresses. Discouragement can be overwhelming to the point of quitting residency and then intervention may not be successful [4]. Residents experiencing stress and burnout may benefit from counseling before giving up [15,18].

Psychological assessment of general surgery residency applicants

      Psychological assessment may be useful in the selection of medical students for general surgery residency programs. Methods of assessment are found in Table 8. Ninety-nine percent of medical students rank general surgery as the first or second most stressful specialty [21]. Some medical students may tolerate stress better than others and may make better surgery residents [41]. Studies that have shown that residents who handle stress better have a greater sense of control over their life [31] and may thrive in a stressful environment such as general surgery [41]. These students have more self-esteem and selfconfidence They like status and economic rewards, and learn by active participation [41]. These students appreciate that general surgery is a stress-producing career [41].

Career counseling when quitting general surgery is inevitable

      In many cases, issues leading to attrition can be mitigated, such as lack of confidence or questions about finding satisfaction in life as a surgeon [14,21]. In other instances, however, career counseling may necessary if quitting general surgery is inevitable, particularly if the individual has personality traits that are not conducive to the practice of surgery. Residents who do not prefer the long hours and physical demands of general surgery but like operating, for instance, may be better suited for a narrower scope of practice like a surgical subspecialty.

      Frustration with the uncontrollable lifestyle and demands of surgery remains the number one reasons residents quit general surgery [3,4,11]. In our original study, some participants reported did not like operating and/or the operating suite [6,27]. It is hard to imagine matriculating into general surgery and then discovering that they do not like operating or the operating room [6,27]. This underscores the importance of early exposure to surgery and its environs in the education and training of prospective surgeons.

      Educating medical students about the unique demands of general surgery residency and practice is crucial to ensure they are properly prepared for what life will be like in these positions [3,9]. Lack of adequate preparation in these areas leads to discouragement an increased risk for quitting [9]. Sometimes, an interest in long term relationships with patients such as emotional, social, and spiritual needs prompts residents to change specialties [6,27]. Physical demands such as call, night work, weekend and holiday call, emergencies and after-hours call make career changes necessary. A lack of grit or lack of passion and perseverance for long term goals may also contribute to career changes [10]. A resident may develop an interest in another surgical or medical specialty which may in turn prompt leaving general surgery. In rare situations, surgery residents leave medicine altogether and pursue a non-medical career [6,27].

Discussion

      Identification of medical students applying for and matriculating into general surgery residencies and current general surgery residents at risk for attrition is often possible. With better education and preparation of medical students who want to pursue general surgery residencies and careers, it may be possible to reduce attrition later when they are residents. Prematriculation screening and selection [4], positive role models [12], faculty mentors [14], reduction of discrimination against females [14], exposure to private practice [13], screening for personality and character traits and psychological assessment may reduce the risk of attrition in medical students applying for surgery residencies [19,20].

      Guidance during a surgery residency [21], mentors and role models [1], female specific accommodations [21,24], improving confidence [18], changing the culture of training programs [4] and support programs and counseling are important in reducing attrition for residents in training [15,26]. Career counseling is also important for those in whole quitting surgery residencies are inevitable [14,21].

      With the dire shortage of general surgeons in this country, an opportunity existsto reduce attrition, attracting more interested medical students, and attracting females interested in general surgery. Subsequently, the residency must be made more attractive, to include the accommodation of female specific needs such as pregnancy, breastfeeding, childcare, etc [21,24]. Women remain the great opportunity for improving the numbers because we lose half of those who match.

      The question remains that if most studies about residency attrition over time lists lifestyle as the number one reason that residents quit general surgery residencies, at what point do we intervene and make general surgery residencies better [1,3,4,8,9,12-15,18-20,24-26]?.

References

  1. Twachtman, Gregory. Many Surgical Residents Consider Quitting During Training. ACS Surgery News. 2014.
  2. Foster KN, Neidert GPM, Brubaker-Rimmer R, Artalejo D, Caruso DM. A Psychological Profile of Surgeons and Surgical Residents. J Surg. 2010; 67: 359-370.
  3. Dodson TF, Webb ALB. Why Do Residents Leave General Surgery? The Hidden Problem in Today’s Programs. Current Surgery. 2005; 62: 128-131.
  4. Bachert A. Residents Continue to Quit General Surgery. Journal of Medicine. 2017.
  5. Taylor G, Wallace JC, Harrell AG, Burkhardt J, Avery DM, Geno CE, Skinner CA, Bell JG. How Can We Attract More Medical Students to General Surgery Residencies? A Study of Medical Student Evaluations of a General Surgery Clerkship for 10 Years: 2005 to 2015. 1974 to 2015. Clin Surg. 2017; 2: 1722.
  6. Avery DM, Wallace JC, Burkhardt J, Bell G, Geno CE, Harrell AG, Taylor G, Tucker MT. Why Do Residents Quit General Surgery Residencies? A Study of 789 Graduates from 3 Campuses Who Matched into General Surgery over 40 Years: 1974 to 2015. Clin Surg. 2017; 2: 1720.
  7. Avery DM, Wallace JC, Skinner CA, Burkhardt J, Bell JG, Geno CE, Harrell AG, Taylor G: How Can We Retain More Female Residents in General Surgery Residencies? A Study of 789 Medical School Graduates from 3 Campuses Who Matched into General Surgery Residencies over 40 Years: 1974 to 2015. Clin Surg. In Progress.
  8. Yeo H, Bucholz E, Sosa JA, Curry L, Lewis FR, Jones AT, Viola K, Lin Z, Bell RH. A National Study of Attrition in General Surgery Training—Which Residents Leave and Where Do They Go. Ann Surg. 2010; 252: 529-536.
  9. Barone JE. More Than Half of General Surgery Residents Think About Quitting. Healthy Living.
  10. Burkhart RA, Tholey RM, Guinto D, Yeo CJ, Chojnacki KA: Grit: A Marker for Residents at Risk for Attrition? Surgery. 2014; 155: 1014-1022.
  11. Morris JB, Leibrandt TJ, Rhodes RS: Voluntary Changes in Surgery Career Paths: A Survey of the Program Directors in Surgery. J Am CollSurg. 2003; 196: 611-616.
  12. Berman L, Rosenthal MS, Curry LA, Evans LV, Gusberg RJ. Attracting Surgical Clerks to Surgical Careers: Role Models, Mentoring and Engagement in the Operating Room. J Am CollSurg. 2008; 207: 793-800.
  13. Schroen AT, Brownstein MR, Sheldon GF. Comparison of Private versus Academic Practice for General Surgeons: A Guide for Medical Students. J Am CollSurg. 2003; 197: 1000-1011.
  14. Evans S, Sarani B. The Modern Medical School Graduate and General Surgery Training. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 274-277.
  15. Phillips D. ‘Alarming’ Burnout Rate in General Surgery Residents. Medscape. 2016.
  16. Musunuru S, Lewis B, Rikkers LF, Chen H. Effective Surgical Residents Strongly Influence Medical Students to Pursue Surgical Careers. J Am CollSurg. 2007; 204: 164-167.
  17. Freischlag JA. Women Surgeons—Still in a Male-Dominated World. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 2008; 81: 203- 204.
  18. Brooks JV, Bosk CL. Bullying is a Systems Problem. Social Science & Medicine. 2012; 77: 11-12.
  19. Linn BS, Zeppa R. Does Surgery Attract Students Who are More Resistant to Stress? Ann Surg. 1984; 2000: 638-643.
  20. Barshes NR, Vavra AK, Miller A, Brunicardi FC, Goss JA, Sweeney JF. General Surgery as a Career: A Contemporary Review of Factors Central to Medical Student Specialty Choice. J Am CollSurg. 2005; 199: 792-799.
  21. Bucholz EM, Sue GR, Yeo H, Roman SA, Bell RH, Sosa JA. Our Trainees’ Confidence. Arch Surg. 2011; 146: 907-914.
  22. McGreevy JM. Maximizing Postgraduate Surgical Education in the Future. Am CollSurg Bull. 2012.
  23. Cogbill TH, Cofer JB, Jarman BT. Contemporary Issues in Rural Surgery. Curr Prob Surg. 2012; 49: 263-318.
  24. Merchant S, Hameed M, Melck A. Pregnancy Among Residents Enrolled in General Surgery (PREGS): A Survey of Residents in a Single Canadian Training Program. Can J Surg. 2011; 54: 375- 380.
  25. Martin, Nicole. Woman Surgeons and the Challenges of Having It All. 2017.
  26. Contessa J, Kyriakides T. Surgical Resident Attrition and the Menninger Morale Curve. Surgical Science. 2011; 2: 397-401.
  27. Geno CE, Avery DM, Wallace JC, Burkhardt J, Bell JG, Harrell AG, Skinner CA, Taylor G. Career Choices of Residents Leaving General Surgery: What Do the Residents Say? Submitted to Clinics in Surgery. 2017.
  28. Whellen TV. Training Surgeons for Tomorrow. AAMC. 2006.
  29. Sullivan MC, Yeo H, Roman SA, Ciarleglio MM, Cong X, Bell RH, Sosa JA. Surgical Residency and Attrition: Defining the Individual and Programmatic Factors Predictive of Trainee Losses. J Am CollSurg. 2013; 216: 461-471.

MedDocs Publishers

We always work towards offering the best to you. For any queries, please feel free to get in touch with us. Also you may post your valuable feedback after reading our journals, ebooks and after visiting our conferences.