• Research Article
  • |
  • Open Access

A model for computerization and implementation of electronic health records in primary health care in Egypt

  • Hend Samy Ibrahim Mohamed
    • Faculty of medicine Cairo University. Lecturer public health, Faculty of medicine Cairo University, Egypt
  • Corresponding Author(s): Hend Samy Ibrahim Mohamed

  • Faculty of medicine Cairo University. Lecturer public health, Faculty of medicine Cairo University, Egypt

  • Dr.hendsamy.com@hotmail.com

  • Mohamed HIS (2020).

  • This Article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Received : Mar 10, 2020
Accepted : May 05, 2020
Published Online : May 08, 2020
Journal : Journal of Community Medicine
Publisher : MedDocs Publishers LLC
Online edition : http://meddocsonline.org

Cite this article: Mohamed HSI. A model for computerization and implementation of electronic health records in Primary health care in Egypt. J Community Med. 2020; 3(1): 1017.

Abstract

Introduction: Primary health care is the corner-stone for universal health coverage. The newly launched family health centers run through family records. Despite their importance they are paper based records and their completeness by health providers consume a lot of effort and time that negatively impact the efficiency and the health care outcome. Electronic health records improve the managerial, operational problems and efficiency which reflects on patient satisfaction.

Methods: This ethnographic study was done in Omrania family health center, Giza governorate, Egypt. The study was done on two phases. First phase involved merely direct observation and assessment of client satisfaction for a period of 18 months. Then development of a model that can be used to overcome the identified operational problems and methods to implement electronic health records in the health centre.

Results: The study showed there was a lack of proper management, organization, integration and staff communication in various departments of Omrania FHC. Patients’ flow was deregulated creating overcrowding and bottle necks that can harm patients. The majority of Patients are not satisfied from various provided services especially waiting time and physician communication skills.

Conclusion: The study endorsed ethnographic qualitative research methods in order to highlight daily work management people interactions and dynamicity and reflect the picture of Omrania FHC in real times. It provided an overview on patient flow and doctor patient communication. The study came up with a unique improvement model for organization and implementation of electronic health records. Future researches involve testing and implementation of the modeling technique.

Keywords: Electronic health records; patients’ satisfaction; health care delivery

Introduction

      Primary health care is the corner-stone of the health care delivery. The World Health Organization declaration of AlmaAta [1] stated that Primary Health Care (PHC) was the key to achieving ‘Health for all by the year 2000. It is fundamental in achieving universal health coverage [1].

      Egypt launched family health services in some accredited primary health care centers. They offer affordable basic benefit package services ensuring patient centered care which become a critical goal for many high‐quality healthcare systems .It ensures patients’ engagement and active participation that will lead to positive outcomes [2].

      Family health centers run their services through family health records [2]. The records play an important role in monitoring of diseases and patterns of healthcare delivery. They provide a complete and exact chronology of treatments, patient results, plans for care and follow-up [3,4]. Patient records are important in assessing adherence to clinical practice guidelines [5,7] and standards [8,10]. Proper medical recording improves efficiency [11,13]. Patient registries are the basic of quality and are used in quality improvement projects that reflect on patient satisfaction and have gained the focal position in modern day [14,15].

      However, patient recording process in healthcare facilities is considered a difficult task, time consuming and lead to improper, incomplete filling and delay in the service delivery due to the lot of paper forms that have to be filled. These delays have been shown to have negative significant effects on patient satisfaction [16,18].

      Electronic Health Records (HER) recently adopted by healthcare systems aiming to improve the quality of care delivered that is reflected on patient safety and satisfaction. EHRs lead to facilitation of healthcare delivery and reduction of medical errors .Furthermore, the EHR system gives the health-care provider instant access to other clinicians’ evaluations, as well as all diagnostic tests. Overall, the EHR are secure ensuring data confidentiality. They greatly improve the efficiency of health facilities and provide more timely service for patients [19]. Different researches showed that electronic recording saves time [23,25]. Knight et al., 2014 showed that uses of an electronic medical recording system led to significant reduction in waiting time and overall time of the process [26]. Finally, studies show that the EHR has a positive effect on investment from savings in drug expenditures, repetitive investigations and billing errors [27].

      From an academic point of view, the EHR is an excellent tool for big data research through the huge amount of clinical information stored in the database [28].

      Despite the importance of electronic patient registries, they are inadequately supported. Management and development of EHR is poor and has not been set as a priority, and its full implementation hasn’t yet achieved especially in developing countries. Their implementation has met some resistance about its impact on the patient experience [24].

      Many studies that dealt with the improving quality of health care and patient satisfaction still focused on the paper-based process [29]. Though there are few studies in the literature that study the transitions to electronic medical recording system and their impact on patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction should be taken into consideration as it is a main measure of healthcare quality. It provides information on how timely and efficient the services provided. Also it measures the success of the health facility in providing patient-centered health care [31,9].

      Given the great benefits of EHR health providers should invest in its implementation. It is a vital component in the field of medicine [30]. Measuring patient satisfaction after implementation of electronic recording system hasn’t been studied in any health facility in Egypt to the best of knowledge; it needs to be studied. This work aimed to identify a method for computerization and implantation of EHR in family health center in Giza governorate.

Methods

Study Type

      The study in this qualitative research is an ethnographic study.

Site of the study

      According to the census conducted by national heath registration system 2016, Omrania FHC serves about 60000 (58639) person within its catchment area. The center serves about 200 patients daily. The staff of FHC includes medical doctors, dentists, nurses, lab technicians, administration team of accounting and secretarial staff. The medical doctors specialized in general and family medicine; there are also medical doctors with other specialties such as obstetrics, gynecology and pediatrics whom are provided by Ministry of Health either on a permanent basis in the center or on a rotational basis. The services provided by the center- in addition to outpatient clinics were immunization, dental services, pharmacy, laboratory services and family planning.

      The FHC supports continuity of care and integration of health services, through using the family files that included demographic, medical information, earlier complaints, diagnosis, treatment prescribed or any other provided services for every member in the family.

Study phases

      The study was done between September 2016 and December 2019 on two phases. First phase was to identify the current working problems. The second phase was generation of a model that can be used to implement EHR and overcome operational problems.

Study tools

1. The researcher used formal and informal observational techniques

      This was done by the researcher to investigate and describe the flow and behavior of patients, also the health service providers’ practices in the FHC.

      The researcher observed 7489 patients and all the staff of the FHC. All day by day behaviors, interactions and communications were recorded and documented as much as possible in hand written notes in more than 650 pages.

      The researcher took 18 months in ethnographic observation. Ethnography is an effective method for highlighting the interaction between people and systems. It demonstrates the work management in real times and places.

      In order to reduce the sampling bias and increase validity the sampling was purposive, instead of random. The researcher covered various times; morning and afternoon shifts and all days of the week. The researcher observed all the departments and clinics of the FHC, all the staff and all types of patients visiting the center for various reasons.

2. Assessment of the patients’ satisfaction

      Patient satisfaction was assessed by the researchers and well-trained investigators carried out exit interview to the patients using structured Arabic questionnaire. These were the patients attending the two-shift periods at Omrania (FHC) (aged 20 years and above) regardless the gender. Consequently, a non-probability /convenient sample of 2500 patients attending the health center were interviewed.

      The interview was held on all days of the week other than Fridays. Verbal consent was obtained from each respondent after assuring the confidentiality of their responses. The development of the questionnaire depended mainly on a rigorous review of the literature and consultation of national experts in the field. The questionnaire was piloted on 100 patients. The results of the pilot test were only used for further development of the questionnaire as regards the simplicity and clarity. The questionnaire composed of four main sections. The first section contained questions about the demographic characteristics of the patients. The second section composed of (30 questions) about patients satisfaction. These questions were categorized into subsections which were organization and ease of admission, waiting time, adequacy, process of medical care and staff performance. Third section contained (14 questions) assessing the patients satisfaction towards the physician communication skills. The responses depended on a Likertscale ranging from dissatisfied, satisfied and highly satisfied. Questions were scored 1-3. There was a section contained general questions assessing overall experience of the patients to the health facility. The answers were recorded if they were agreed or disagree. Finally, the last section was an open end question asking the patient to tell his experience about his visit to the center.

Study ethics

      The study was approved by the ethical committee of faculty of medicine Cairo University. There was also an official approval from Ministry of health and population and Giza governorate.

Data analysis

      The observational notes content was analyzed and thematic analysis was done. Interpretation and conceptualization for the qualitative data of the observation was done for identifying the operational problems. The researchers coded the responses of the patient satisfaction questionnaire and transferred the data to the computer for analysis using SPSS (version 9). Initially there was descriptive statistics following the computation, a total score was calculated for each participant. The mean percent score of satisfaction was calculated as following equation: (Total score X100 / Maximum possible score). Subjects were categorized those who had mean percent score less than 60% were categorized as dissatisfied, mean percent score from 60% to 75% were categorized as satisfied while those with mean percent score from 75% and more were categorized as highly satisfied.

Results

1. Patients flow and behavior

      Patients visiting FHC Omrania FHC stopped at the crowded check-in window and their visit recorded. They didn’t take a turn number and were not guided to which clinic he/she had to go. Then they have to wait in the crowded waiting room for a long time until the nurse call them. Patients sometimes miss their turn as they don’t hear the nurses call due to noise and crowdedness. So, they have to wait more time making them bored and exhausted.

      When doctors order lab investigations, patients have to take the results back to them. They became reluctant to submit these lab investigations as they have to wait again longer time which can reach more than two or three hours. Sometimes patients skipped doing the lab investigations. Or after doing them they took the investigations results and leave the facility without returning back to the doctor which means not receiving their complete medical care. Also, this would result in failure of recording the lab investigations in their files and incomplete filling system. Similar situations occurred while receiving any other service from the facility such as medications, immunization or family planning. The patients may leave before taking these required services.

      While the patient in the waiting room, the clerk responsible for the files search for the patient’s file and gave it by hand to the physician. That was taking a long time and sometimes the clerk didn’t find the file of the patient. This made all the procedures done to the patient weren’t recorded, hence affecting the quality of service in providing continuity of healthcare.

      Patients who didn’t have files receive a small booklet included the patient’s name, complaint, diagnosis, and the treatment prescribed. The health provider may add extra notes as diagnoses, test results, etc. The patients took these booklets home and supposed to bring them in their subsequent visits but sometimes they forgot them. The center have very poor technology infrastructure. There was no connection between different departments of the center.

2. Physician practice

      Physicians were working in a stressful healthcare environment. They had a lot of paper work that consumed time which could be better allocated in providing quality services to the patients. Due to disorganization and crowdedness there was no time to respond quickly or listen to patients. Physicians weren’t fully willing to help patients or to give them prompt services, assurance, personal attention, health education or convenient consultations.

A Model that can be implemented in omrania Fhc

      The researchers believe that the electronic medical records can be used to improve health care in developing countries. It can help to improve efficiency and effectiveness of the health services especially in the scarcity of medical and financial resources. For choosing the software that will be implemented in the FHC its simplicity and to be inexpensive are fundamental domains to ensure implementation, sustainability and generalizability of the methods.

      The introduction of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) software requires computers and Network connection. The computers will all be connected together by crossover cable through the network ports.

      The EMR software is password protected. Each patient had a unique ID. The data entry screen contained tabs for demographic data, patient history, clinics that the patient visited the laboratory findings, medications, or any specific information. Each tab selects a sub screen that contains all the fields relevant to the section.

      Each section in the software will be filled in the corresponding place in the FHC, such as the demographic data, reason of visit filled by clerk in the registration room, the clinical information by the physician in the examination room, the medications by the pharmacist and laboratory results will be filled by the lab technicians. After the patients finish their visit the file will then be transmitted to the head of the health facility and stored at his computer device.

      All the FHC staff has to be trained on the software for a period of at least six months to break their fears and distrust in computers and making them familiar with the new system. To practice before implementation they can enter all the data of the files in the electronic software.

      Based on the findings of the observation, the researcher made a model for organization that can be implemented in the FHC as seen in the flow chart Figure 1. First the patient will visit the registration office then, depending on each patient’s age and clinical problem, the patient will be directed to the right clinic. There will be establishment of interconnections between the clinics and departments of the FHC.

      At the end before leaving, the patient will receive a printed copy of his detailed management and health education materials will be sent on his mobile phone according to each case.

table 1 Table 1

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the patients

table 2 Table 2

Table 2: Demographic characteristics of the patients

      As shown in the table the majority of the patients are dissatisfied especially from waiting time.

table 3 Table 3

Table 3: Mean percent score of patients’ satisfaction with communication skills of the physician

table 4 Table 4

Table 4: Percent of agreement of patients regarding their general experience in the health facility

Discussion and conclusion

      A large sector of the Egyptian population uses the primary healthcare centers which are the first line of contact to the health care services. The Egyptian Health Sector Reform Program initiated a new primary care strategy in accredited facilities, known as Family Health Centers (FHC). These centers provide a newly introduced Family Health Model (FHM) that brings high quality Basic Benefit Package of services to the patients [11].

      In order to fulfill its function the family health facility should have proper and effective managerial system. Health providers have to work together in integration and harmony to meet the health facility goals [31]. Unfortunately, it was shown that Omrania FHC lack proper management, organization, integration and staff communication in its various departments. There was also defect in patient flow leading to patients overcrowding creating bottle necks which could harm patients, prolong waiting time or fail to deliver his/her needs.

      The explanation of this was similar to that explained through an exploratory study done by Elden et al, 2015 in primary health care facilities in Egypt. They stated that there was no human resources plan, no training of the managers on organizational management and absence of job description .Moreover there was overwhelming repetitive and duplicative paperwork required from the physicians which waste their time needed for patient care .Additionally, the decisions taken were subjective due to under developed information system and lack of monitoring and supervision [32].

      Organization in health facilities and the managerial performance have a significant impact on the service quality that reflects on patient satisfaction [33]. Patient satisfaction is a main measure of healthcare quality. It provides information on how timely and efficient the services provided. Also it measures the success of the health facility in providing patient-centered health care [34]. Assessing the patient satisfaction in Omrania FHC revealed that the majority of the patients were not satisfied with the organization and ease of admission. That was similar to a study which concluded that patient satisfaction improved by monitoring and developing the organizational activities and processes [35].

      Moreover 93% of patients were not satisfied from the prolonged waiting time. Waiting time considered an important factor in determining quality of care and represents a valuable tool for evaluating patient satisfaction [36].

      In a study conducted in the United States, the patients waiting time was more than 30 minutes which wasn’t accepted by patients [37]. Other studies reported similar findings and showed that patients were not satisfied with the prolonged waiting time [38].

      It should be noted that time constraint is a major problem in health facilities especially if it had a high number of patients, and only a short time available for the consultation [38] as in Omrania FHC.

      Improper organization, deregulation and prolonged waiting time in Omrania FHC reflected negatively on the process of medical care. It was shown that 74% of the patients were not satisfied from the medical care process.

      On the other hand work satisfaction of health care providers is a fundamental parameter that influences their performance, productivity, quality of work and consequently patient satisfaction [39].

      It was found that the majority of patients in the study were not satisfied from the performance of the staff. One of the reasons to explain this was overwhelmed and exhausted staff had to fill the paper medical records which are time-consuming and interrupts the communication with patients.

      Effective physician patient communication is a vital component in patient-centered care. Communication with patients not only focuses on sharing medical information and treatments but also acknowledges’ emotional needs of the patients [40].

      The studied patients were not satisfied with the physicians' communication skills. There should be time for communication with each patient according to his needs and concerns. Patientcentered communication are not usually practiced or improved in many health facilities [41].

      Since the physician had no appropriate time for proper patient care and communication this calls the need of electronic medical records. Implementing the EHR showed improvement in physician patient communication through the development of the physicians' active listening skills. The physicians had more time to discuss and explain health issues and proper usage of medications. Patients felt that it was convenient to ask questions about their health status and concerns [42]. Similar findings were reported, where patients perceived EHRs favorably, and most of them experienced that the physicians were more attentive during the medical consultation. A qualitative study done by observation of physicians during the clinical consultation, after EHR implementation demonstrated that the physicians were more able to ask encouraging questions and explaining health topics when compared to paper medical records. There was more time available for discussing various health concerns, explaining the investigations, and treatment options [43].

      In the study the researcher developed a model for organizing the patient flow and the method for computerization and implementation of EHR in Omarnia FHC. Electronic recording systems are fundamental in the health facilities and one of the essential building blocks for health sector reform [14]. EHR can overcome operational and managerial problems, support the management system, and strengthen the ability of the health facility to reduce avoidable harm, improve efficiency, productivity and promote a better health care [44]. In Australia, Health Connect is a joint Australian, State and Territory Governments initiative was for revolving paper-based health records to EHR. It was shown that it improved the quality of healthcare, safety and efficiency [45].

      Similarly, EHR helped the healthcare providers in improvement and better exchange of information as laboratory results, scans reports between providers in different departments of the health facility [46]. A systemic review found that EHR has a positive impact on information sharing between different departments and between physicians and patients [47].

Figure 1: Flow Chart

      EHR system had increased patient satisfaction with the services delivered [48,49] Facilities used electronic records scored higher in organization of the patients' medical care process and in patient satisfaction [50,51]. It was believed that EHRs improved the quality of care [38].

      From the ethnographic qualitative study the daily work management people interactions and dynamicity was highlighted. The study reflected the picture of Omrania FHC in real times. It provided an overview on patient flow and doctor patient communication and the underlying operational problems that dramatically would reflect on patient health and survival. The study came up with a unique improvement model for organization and implementation of electronic health records. Future research involves testing and implementation of the modeling technique.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Seventy.second World Health Assembly. Report by the Director.General. Universal health coverage. Primary health care towards universal health coverage. Provisional agenda item 11.5 (A72/12). 2019.
  2. World health organization WHO. Health system reform Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory. EMRO. 2006.
  3. Biondich PG, Anand V, Downs SM, et al. Using adaptive turnaround documents to electronically acquire structured data in clinical settings. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium. 2003; 86.90.
  4. Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, et al. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med vol. 2001; 345: 965.70.
  5. CfD Control, Prevention. Use of a registry to improve acute stroke care—seven states, 2005–2009. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2011; 60: 206.
  6. Carlhed R, Bojestig M, Wallentin L, et al.Improved adherence to Swedish national guidelines for acute myocardial infarction: the Quality Improvement in Coronary Care (QUICC) study. American heart journal. 2006; 152: 1175–81.
  7. Fonarow GC, Albert NM, Curtis AB, et al.Improving evidence. based care for heart failure in outpatient cardiology practices primary results of the registry to Improve the Use of Evidence. Based Heart Failure Therapies in the Outpatient Setting (IMPROVE HF). Circulation. 2010; 122: 585.596.
  8. Ha JF, Longnecker N. Doctor. patient communication: A review. Ochsner J. 2010; 10: 38.43.
  9. Biglu MH, Nateq F, Ghojazadeh M, et al. Communication Skills of Physicians and Patients’ Satisfaction. Mater Sociomed. 2017; 29: 192–195.
  10. King A, Hoppe RB. “Best practice” for patient.centered communication: a narrative review. J Grad Med Educ. 2013; 5: 385– 393.
  11. Kuosmanen I, Hatonen H, Jyrkinen AR, et al. Patient satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient care. J Adv Nurs. 2006; 55: 655.663.
  12. Bener A , Suhaila G. Gender difference on patients’ satisfaction and expectation. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2013; 16: 285.291.
  13. Swanson KA, Bastani R, Rubenstein LV, et al. Effect of Mental Health Care and Shared Decision making on Patient Satisfaction in a Community sample of Patient with Depression. Med Care Res Rev. 2007; 64: 416.430.
  14. World Health Organization. Monitoring the Building Blocks of Health System: A Handbook of Indicators and Their Measurement Strategies. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. 2010.
  15. Jamoom EW, Heisey.Grove D, Yang N, et al. Physician Opinions about EHR Use by EHR Experience and by Whether the Practice had optimized its EHR Use. J Health Med Inform. 2016; 7: 1000240.
  16. Jaipaul CK, Rosenthal GE. Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients? J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18: 23–30.
  17. Evans RS. Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. Yearb Med Inform. 2016.
  18. Darius J, Paul F, Patrice N, et al. An Electronic medical record system to support HIV treatment in rural Haiti, AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 2003: 87.
  19. National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Engineering and the Health Care System, Reid PP, Compton WD, Grossman JH, Fanjiang G, eds. Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). 2005.
  20. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: A valid concept? Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38: 509.516.
  21. El.Kareh R, Gandi TK, Poon EG, et al. Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2009; 24: 464.468.
  22. Owonaro AP, Eniojukan FJ, Owonaro AD, et al. Assessment of patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services in a hospital in Bayelsa state south.South of Nigeria. Ortho & Rheum Open Access. 2017; 6: 555.686.
  23. Prakash B. Patient satisfaction. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010; 3: 151–155.
  24. El.Kareh R, Gandi TK, Poon EG, et al. Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2009; 24: 464.468.
  25. Owonaro AP, Eniojukan FJ, Owonaro AD, Ebinyo CN. Assessment of patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services in a hospital in Bayelsa state south.South of Nigeria. Ortho & Rheum Open Access 2017; 6: 555.686.
  26. Knight V, Guy R. J, Handan W, et al. It is more efficient to type: Innovative self.registration and appointment self.arrival system improves the patient reception process. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2014; 41: 392–394.
  27. Hoque DME, Kumari V, Hoque M, et al. Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12: e0183667.
  28. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Leavy MB. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. 3rd ed: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 2014.
  29. Chand S, Moskowitz H, Norris J. B, et al.Improving patient flow at an outpatient clinic: Study of sources of variability and improvement factors. Health Care Management Science. 2009; 12: 325–340.
  30. Migdal CW, Namavar AA, Mosley VN, et al. EHR Impact on Patient Experience. J. Hosp. Med 2014; 10: 627.633.
  31. Manzoor F, Wei L, Hussain A, et al. Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services; An Application of Physician’s Behavior as a Moderator. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 3318.
  32. Elden NM, Rizk HI, Wahby G .Improving Health System in Egypt: Perspectives of Physicians. Egyptian Journal of Community Medicine. 2016; 34.
  33. Koné Péfoyo AJ, Wodchis WP. Organizational performance impacting patient satisfaction in Ontario hospitals: a multilevel analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2013; 6:509. Published 2013.
  34. Manzoor F, Wei L, Hussain A, et al. Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services; An Application of Physician’s Behavior as a Moderator. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 3318.
  35. Koné Péfoyo AJ, Wodchis WP. Organizational performance impacting patient satisfaction in Ontario hospitals: A multilevel analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2013; 6:509. Published 2013.
  36. Al.Harajin RS, Al.Subaie SA, Elzubair AG. The association between waiting time and patient satisfaction in outpatient clinics: Findings from a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med. 2019; 26: 17–22.
  37. Anderson RT, Camacho FT, Balkrishnan R. Willing to wait. The influences of patient wait time on satisfaction with primary care? BMC Health Serv Res. 2007; 7: 31.
  38. Med F, Sci M, Alnemer KA, Al.homood IA, et al. A multicenter study of factors affecting patient’s satisfaction visiting primary health care clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Fam Med Med Sci Res. 2015; 4: 2.5.
  39. Nikic D, Arandjelovic M, Nikolic M, Stankovic A. Job Satisfaction in Health Care Workers. Acta Medica Medianae. 2008; 47: 9.12.
  40. Azizam NA, Shamsuddin K. Healthcare Provider.Patient Communication: A Satisfaction Study in the Outpatient Clinic at Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Malays J Med Sci. 2015; 22: 56.64.
  41. Barrier PA, Li TJ, Jensen NM. Two words to improve physician. patient communication: what else? Mayo Clin. 2003; 78: 211– 214.
  42. Migdal CW, Namavar AA, Mosley VN, et al. EHR Impact on Patient Experience. J Hosp Med. 2014; 10: 627.633.
  43. Arar NH, Wang CP, Pugh JA. Self.care communication during medical encounters: implications for future electronic medical records. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2006; 3: 3.
  44. Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011; 4: 47–55.
  45. Health Connect. 2012.
  46. Payne TH, Lovis C, Gutteridge C, et al. Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries. J Glob Health. 2019; 9: 0204279.
  47. Alkureishi MA, Lee WW, Lyons M, et al. Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient.Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31: 548–560.
  48. Manzoor F, Wei L, Hussain A, et al. Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services; an Application of Physician’s Behavior as a Moderator. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 3318.
  49. Evans RS. Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. Yearb Med Inform. 2016; 1: S48–S61.
  50. Klinkenberg WD, Boslaugh S, Waterman BM, et al. Inpatients’ willingness to recommend: a multilevel analysis. Health Care Manag Rev. 2011; 36: 349–358.
  51. Dansky KH, Brannon D, Wangsness S. Human resources management practices and patient satisfaction in home health care. Home Health Care Serv Q. 1994; 15: 43–56.

MedDocs Publishers

We always work towards offering the best to you. For any queries, please feel free to get in touch with us. Also you may post your valuable feedback after reading our journals, ebooks and after visiting our conferences.